Saturday, August 30, 2014

DPD Another Veteran Gone – What Will It Take?




DPD lost another officer Friday a young man that Joe Whisenant and I have known all of his life. Joe hired him because he came from family who had been here in Douglas County for many years. They   helped the community grow and prosper by opening businesses, real estate, and creating jobs.

 

This young man wanted to carry on the tradition by being a Douglasville Police officer. He wanted to serve directly by being a cop. I can’t call him by name because he wanted to ride on off to his new department without any fuss over him.

 

Folk’s this is the epitome of what Douglasville is losing. He has a good work ethic, good arrest record, and all around good guy. A young man who came to the PD wet behind the ears young’un who had a lot to learn about the job the good side and bad side and is on the right path. He is like a son to me. I still see him for lunch with him because I care for him. A young cop needs an old cop to talk with on occasion. I wish I had one years ago.

 

He was hired by another agency and he turned in his two week notice Friday. He was told to turn his equipment in Tuesday morning – after he worked the parade Monday morning which is mandatory to all slick sleeve officers.

 

Why did he leave? There was no where he could go. There were no opportunities for advancement. He had applied for different positons only to be turned down. The only way to receive a pay raise at the department now is to take promotion but, he was denied that opportunity. He was never told what to do to make promotion.  There is a problem there you have to create and encourage young folks. That was one thing Sheriff Lee did to me as a young deputy. That is the reason I went as far as I did.

 

On his final shift he got into a foot chase and ran into a tree limb. He suffered a corneal abrasion to his left eye and when I spook to him he was still in severe pain. That is not the way you treat a guy who has been with you that long particular when he takes an injury like that.

 

Happened to me with them I couldn’t work for two months on a workman’s comp injury when they told me to go. They have offered me $2000.  I made more than twice that. Do you know why they offered that? I am the only one that stood up to them. I lost the first of the lawsuits due to their hiding behind qualified immunity. That was round 1.

 

This young’un still has to see an optometrist. I hope he is able to go on to his new job and not put out of work I was. Y’all give lift him up in prayer.

 

Folks don’t y’all see what is going on? There is a pattern here. There are many stories just like mine and his. Until you take the reins in hand and force the council to go against the grain there will be no changes.

 

You want to know the real tragedy? He is taking a $9000 pay cut. Now what do you say citizens? You have two governments in the City of Douglasville. The City of Douglasville  and its employees and Douglasville Police Department and its employees. They run separately. No one is over DPD contrary to what you are told.

Wednesday, August 6, 2014

DPD Officers Pay 2013

The one thing that has never been put out for folks to know is how much the officer are making. It is a factor. This came from the city and is open record. This is gross pay with no benefits. Just support the Police Department and hope for a good outcome from all of this.








Officer's Pay 2013


POSITION YTD GROSS
COURT SECURITY OFFIC $15,501.20
POLICE OFFICER $64,185.78
COURT SECURITY OFFIC $16,935.62
POLICE OFFICER $57,306.82
SERGEANT $67,546.69
COURT SECURITY OFFIC $11,062.20
COURT SECURITY OFFICER $11,515.02
COURT SECURITY OFFICER $3,042.80
MAJOR $87,263.27
CAPTAIN $78,737.70
DEUTY CHIEF $87,260.35
POLICE CHIEF $94,723.39
LIEUTENANT $70,659.31
DETECTIVE $59,124.46
POLICE OFFICER $43,392.02
LIEUTENANT $69,171.98
SERGEANT $63,253.68
DETECTIVE $66,177.06
SERGEANT $63,736.99
DETECTIVE $13,012.31
DETECTIVE $44,590.24
DETECTIVE $43,495.89
DETECTIVE $52,431.01
DETECTIVE $47,594.20
DETECTIVE $56,557.92
DETECTIVE $16,395.17
DETECTIVE $52,940.13
POLICE OFFICER $46,697.46
DETECTIVE $55,485.57
DETECTIVE $48,446.16
DETECTIVE $43,936.19
CAPTAIN $81,409.91
DETECTIVE $47,576.70
POLICE OFFICER $44,186.98
DETECTIVE $57,436.41
DETECTIVE $88,145.90
LIEUTENANT $66,573.33
CAPTAIN $72,101.85
POLICE OFFICER $40,513.84
SERGEANT $50,772.89
POLICE OFFICER $41,751.72
POLICE OFFICER $42,033.87
POLICE OFFICER $44,071.88
POLICE OFFICER $21,877.46
POLICE OFFICER $8,850.05
POLICE OFFICER $41,137.25
LIEUTENANT $65,329.61
POLICE OFFICER $18,324.13
POLICE OFFICER $20,362.16
POLICE OFFICER $49,139.50
POLICE OFFICER $21,707.16
POLICE OFFICER $42,581.73
SERGEANT $62,222.55
POLICE OFFICER $43,362.79
POLICE OFFICER $48,331.34
POLICE OFFICER $57,885.60
BOOKING OFFICER $20,109.55
POLICE OFFICER $41,084.32
POLICE OFFICER $33,949.89
POLICE OFFICER $41,953.74
POLICE OFFICER $57,618.97
POLICE OFFICER $54,805.37
POLICE OFFICER $56,973.88
POLICE OFFICER $4,576.71
POLICE OFFICER $41,601.49
POLICE OFFICER $60,499.16
POLICE OFFICER $39,954.18
POLICE OFFICER $39,645.82
POLICE OFFICER $43,332.19
POLICE OFFICER $76,355.77
POLICE OFFICER $26,670.38
LIEUTENANT $70,257.30
POLICE OFFICER $3,205.72
POLICE OFFICER $38,679.29
POLICE OFFICER $44,144.57
BOOKING OFFICER $56,610.67
POLICE OFFICER $56,517.42
POLICE OFFICER $44,927.13
SERGEANT $70,426.49
POLICE OFFICER $43,505.60
POLICE OFFICER $26,365.66
POLICE OFFICER $8,392.23
POLICE OFFICER $40,428.18
POLICE OFFICER $38,147.03
POLICE OFFICER $55,083.49
SERGEANT $61,148.72
LIEUTENANT $60,294.39
LIEUTENANT $71,528.04
POLICE OFFICER $37,227.53
POLICE OFFICER $57,464.53
BOOKING OFFICER $42,980.82
POLICE OFFICER $52,154.35
POLICE OFFICER $45,971.07
POLICE OFFICER $59,552.80
POLICE OFFICER $59,474.28
SERGEANT $69,945.09
POLICE OFFICER $47,245.57
POLICE OFFICER $33,850.28
SERGEANT $67,622.67
POLICE OFFICER $61,957.32
POLICE OFFICER $44,481.03
CAPTAIN $81,308.68
POLICE OFFICER $45,056.89
BOOKING OFFICER $8,982.00
LIEUTENANT $58,000.88
POLICE OFFICER $62,954.93
   

Thursday, July 31, 2014

DPD - Shortage of Staff Not a New Issue




Well, all the hoopla over Chris Womack is done he kept his job he is safe for now. All of you are happy you have saved the day and the police department. Pat yourself on the back and be happy.  Before I go any further be sure to read the last paragraph.

I really thought that I helped the staff along as they did a good job on the meeting with the mayor but, I quickly found out never hold out the hand of friendship as you will draw back a nub. So, don’t be too happy.  Y'all been had. Take look back to the last quarter of 2013.  The police department was in a serious crisis then but, it was not brought to your attention. Matter of fact it was quietly put away. The Sentinel ran a post about it and the council knew however, with the holidays etc. it went to the back burner in a hurry.

What you don’t know see or know is since Chris Womack came into office there has been an exodus of folks from the department. Willingly, forced out, or run off.

The first to go were folks over 50. There were three of us. Yep I was in the first volley. Right now I will not go into detail but, I will tell you that you will see the reasons on my case and another in the future.  The three of us didn’t fit the profile of a super department.

Then the command staff slowly weeded out those who did not fit the description of what was wanted at the DPD. Young chiseled bodied officers.  These officers went to the gym every day and fit the superman or GI Joe description.  They were the oh-rah of  DPD or, as called affectionately “Law Dog”

Few ladies were hired during  the period.  To my knowledge  there are three female supervisors at the police department today.  One Captain, Sergeant, and a corporal the only one on the street is the corporal. The sergeant is in communications and the Captain is in the Command Staff.

In any case keeping officers under the current administration has been an issue.  What you don’t know is in the last three months of 2013 the department lost 12 officers. Go look it up. This Command Staff cant keep people. From October to November 12 officers walked out the door. Folks there is a problem and a pattern here. The FBI calls that a clue. There are serious personnel issues in this department. The command staff has been given too many chances. Y'all might want to pass this along. More to come.... 

Monday, July 28, 2014

DPD Film with Mayor Persons






Ya know, when the email first came out about a meeting with Mayor Persons and DPD troops I was really amazed at what I saw on Topix. In case you didn’t see the message here it is so we can reference to it during this blog:


 


“The Mayor met with the Police Department today and basically told Officers to piss off. He asked who live in Douglasville and 3 Officers raised their hands. He stated there are not enough of you living in the city to determine if I get re-elected... And then proceeded to tell Officers he isn't here to make friends. He got visibly mad when Officers asked him questions about the statistics he has about why Officers are leaving and got even madder when they questioned the Cities stupid purchases of certain properties! He stated the Police is the backbone of the City, but acknowledged if the pay study comes back saying they are under paid the City doesn't have the money to implement raises any time soon... Officers began to walk out of the meeting.”


 


I contacted a few folks and ask about it and discovered mixed signals. Most say Mayor Persons took some hard questions and he made some very sobering statements to the folks. No one in the meeting was happy.  No one viewed the meeting as being out of control.


 


I watched the video about 4 times. Mayor Persons came into the room and was prepared for the meeting as best as he could be. Evidently Chris Womack had a box set p for the officers to leave their questions to be answered at that meeting. Mayor Persons decided not to answer those instead having Chris Womack and Bill Osborne to look over them and deciding the course of action.


 


Knowing local and state government I understand that lot that would have to be addressed through committees, personnel, and the legal department. I can understand Mayor Persons stance on this as police can come up with a lot of questions that do indeed take a lot of research. The last thing you want to do in a meeting with mad police officer’s is making a mistake because, take they will eat you alive.


 


The question or statement of that the three officers could not re-elect him he was honest. However, he qualified his answer by saying the reason was each and every employee out there had to do a good job if they didn’t know elected official could get re-elected. I have heard that one more than once in my career. He told the officers more than one time how good of a job they were doing and if they didn’t he would be gone next time.


 


After seeing what happened at the meeting I believe a lot of feelings and emotions were at play by all of those there. From City Management, Command Staff, and officers all were concerned and have a right to be. Everyone in the room had an agenda. Some wanted the study and receive increases immediately, one wanted to know if they were making too much would they lose money, and health insurance coverage.


 


I believe that Mayor Persons was honest and sincere to the officers were the ones making the city look at a new pay plan. They recognize that it has to be done and is long overdue. The officers have brought to the front the highest cost of running a business and that is employees and benefits.


 


The plan we had was to be upgraded every year to keep quality employees and older employees on board. Your starting salary was the most important for the scale. Once hired on you knew where you would be for the next several years until top out. Once at top out you only got cost of living. That was an issue with some of the long timers they didn’t understand that a police officer should be making 80,000 per year for longevity – give me a break.


 


In any case been i have been there done that at the state level and city level. It will take at the minimum of a year to evaluate each employee’s job qualifications and then does the salary study of other cities. It must be understood by all the entire city will be evaluated as all salaries have to be updated.


 


You must hire an outside firm to conduct the study. I understand the frustration there but, if you want it done right this is the way it goes. The study cannot be instituted by the city for several reasons but, territorial disputes, favoritism, and fairness are a few. If you hang on it will be worth your trouble.


 


Wherein lays the problem. Are the citizens standing behind you now are willing to up the taxes on their property to finance salary increases for every employee? My guess is they will.  


 


There was an officer who asked Mayor Persons not being employee friendly. The mayor told him he liked to come up and ride and hang out sometimes with the guys but, the mayor was as blunt as Sheriff Lee was to a group of folks that walked out on him. He was not there to be their friend when it came down to the job he was their boss. If they weren’t happy they should leave.


 


I have heard that speech at every job I have had in law enforcement and if I were still there would be hearing it now. Mayor Persons handled bad news as best he could. However, there comes a time you draw a line in the sand. Either you get with the program and try to be a partner in fixing the problems or you make your decision.


 


A question came up about paying for street lights and other frivolous items. These Pink Elephants have been around for years losing money. Aint going away any time soon. You can start the finger pointing to the Administration of then Mayor Thompson. During his time the salaries were frozen and the city under took a large – no exorbitant land purchasing and grant acquisitions that are pulling the city under.


 


While at DPD I obtained 3 police officers on a COPS that they may or may not have had funds to continue their salaries. If you don’t keep those promises you will not receive another grant. You don’t want that relationship with the Department of Justice to erode. Besides it has my name on it. Seriously there are obligations that you may not be aware of that must be met.


 


I have heard stories from folks about not being treated right and disciplinary issues. You had your chance to talk and I know most of you wouldn’t because of the setting. I will bet you now that suggestion box will be your chance to make those comments. But, you can’t do this stuff without telling who you are. If that doesn’t work use the chain at City hall Mayor Persons made it clear many times he wanted to get to the root of the problems. Sounds to me like the door are open but, they are not going to act on an unsigned complaint. Get with the program.


 


Instead of dissecting the rest of the program it all comes down to this. In 37 years of public service I have heard the same speech – at times a little more flavorful from every supervisor Sheriff, Director, or Police Chief. As close as Joe Whisenant and I were friends at the end of the day he was the boss and I was an employee. I had worked for him at the Sheriff’s office in the 80’s and we had the same understanding then. You all have gotten the attention of the community, your command staff, city administration, and elected officials. I urge you to hang in there.


 

Sunday, July 20, 2014

Disparage Treatment - What Reasoning Is Used In Making POST Reporting?


Sometimes officers do stupid things that turn into a huge mistake simply because they do not tell the truth when they screw up. There is a rule of law known as Brady material that requires an agency who has an officer who has lied to report that act to the district attorney’s office so that it can be made available to the defense in order to impeach the officer on the stand. It isn’t pretty when this happens. Lying can occur without thinking, spontaneous, or planed.  Command staff and internal investigators must determine if the action was an intention act that went to such a level that it caused severe discipline. 

 

In the previous blog I told you about disparage treatment at the Douglasville Police Department. Again before I left I was familiar with another case this one the officer lied and was fired. There is a twist to the case you will see in the end. Here is the synopsis from POST:

 

CASE NO. 010-724-03-07

 

CASE SUMMARY

 

This individual is Multi Certified (Jailer 10/15/03, Basic 07/13/05) and was employed by the most recent agency on 10/17/06. On 02/16/07 said officer resigned while under investigation for leaving the scene of an accident.
 

Said officer received a call to respond to a stolen vehicle. According to documentation in the file, the owner of the vehicle had the vehicle in question, blocked in a subdivision. While en route to the call, said officer lost control of his/her vehicle, striking a mailbox. Said officer failed to call in the accident or stay at the scene. Said officer drove back to the police department to change the flat tire.
 

While said officer was changing the tire, the owner (complainant) of the mailbox came to the police department. The complainant reported that his mailbox had been knocked down by a police car. According to the complainant, after hearing the loud noise, the complainant came out and saw his mailbox had been knocked down.


The complainant then saw a police car going toward the police station that appeared to have a flat tire. The complainant asked said officer if said officer had hit his. mailbox. Said officer told him that said officer did hit the mailbox while he/she was en route to a call. Said officer apologized for the damage and told the complainant that he/she planned to come back and tell the complainant after he/she completed the call.

 

According to the I.A. report, said officer told them. Major "I freaked and wanted to get the vehicle to the police department. "I know I left the scene of an accident." It is also noted in the report that said officer failed to report the incident to the supervisor before being confronted by the complainant. There was nothing else negative in said officer's file.

 

This investigator went to another agency where said officer had been employed prior to working for the most recent agency. The CEO of that agency told this investigator that said officer was a real good officer. According to the CEO, said officer wrote more tickets than all of the other officers in the department. Said officer voluntarily resigned from that agency to work for a larger department.

 

Said officer is not currently employed in law enforcement.

 

See attachment A for said officer's response as well as letters from his/her supervisors. 

 

Previous P.O.S.T. Case: None Noted

 

Training Deficiency: None Noted 

 

CASE NO. 010-724-03-07

 

Disciplinary History: None Noted

 

.    Criminal History: None Noted

 

Drivers History: Status Valid

 

1. 04/29/98  Speeding (72 in 55)

2. 09/07/95  Suspension: Failure to Appear

3. 05/25/92  Speeding (71 in 55)

 

Recommendation to Council:

pursuant to O.C.G.A. 35-8-7.1(6,7,8)

24 Months Probation Upon Rehire Public  Reprimand           Dolly Johnson     

PCC Chairman

Date:   January 9, 2008

 

As you can see the officer was fired for lying to his superior officer about the true cause of the accident. He was fired and the firing prompt reported to POST. He was given 24 months probation if he was ever hired by a police department and given a public reprimand. 

 

If you read the previous blog what would POST done with the assault case had it been reported promptly? More than likely at least the sentence above but, more than likely they would have taken his certification for a period of time. Do you see the disparagement that officers are seeing? There are others out there.

 

Now for the twist within the past year DPD re-hired this officer. He had been charged and convicted of lying and he comes back to Douglasville Police Department. 


Every officer knew of the accident and the lie. Supervisors were asked if they had a problem with the man coming back. What would you say? The decision had been made the Command Staff was going to hire him anyway I would have done what I did but, shouldn't have done, the last five I was there yes sir what ever you want and let it go.


I gave you the description of Brady now what would have happened if he was the first officer on the scene or, involved in a critical incident and the only witness? There would be a big problem in there the DA would have a hard time getting the case off the ground. His previous cases could have been affected also. Fortunately, I understand the officer has resigned within the past few months let us hope nothing important is in jeopardy.

 

Running a police department is not like running a day camp. You have rules, regulations, and laws you must abide by. You cannot ignore POST rules as if they weren’t there simply because, you want to avoid having an officer off the road for months. No law enforcement agency or its officers are above the law.